Sunday, February 10, 2019

Post World War Two :: WWII World War 2 Essays

Directly after World War II the US effectively shut the door on t out(a) ensemble communist nations. A violent scare descended on the US as the iron curtain enwrap around Eastern Europe. Mistrust and misunderstanding take to decades of arms races and virtually calls with a people that helped us to defeat Hitler and Japan. Mean time, the open door in China was slammed in our faces by our own ignorance and suspicion. Though the confrontationist policy of the US may stimulate been an effective tool to use in wartime while dealing with a dictator, it was not correct to use in peacetime. By misconstruing Stalins actions after World War II the US confounded any chance of amiable relations. The US first misunderstood Stalins annexation of the Baltic republics. Moreover, a desire to have a dampen zone between the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe was mistaken by the West as aggressive Communist imperialism along the lines of Hitlers pre-war expansion. Granted, Stalin did harbor desi res to spread his ideology, as did we. However, his desire to defend the vulnerability that had been exploit so many times was the rationale behind the occupation of Poland. Moreover, the get together States history of ideological imperialism is much longer and more colorful than that of the Soviets. Anti-Communist sentiments in the US government as well as the population supply by misinformation cost the US any type of association with the Soviets. The post-war was the immaculate time to become friendly with the Soviets. The Russians were decimated by the war and needed all the help they could get. Stalins possible acceptance of accommodation, though only out of necessity, could have been used by the US to gain ground in Asia. However, like always, our own paranoia catalyzed by confrontationist propaganda cost us any hopes of a relationship. A history of anti-Communist feelings compounded by this type of ignorance also led the US to lose all relations with China. By making the arrogance that Mao ZeTungs brand of communism was the same as that of the Bolsheviks, the US lost a potentially powerful ally. If the US had been more careful, if we had sure those whose job it was to know, the division between the communism in Be-jing and the communism in Moscow would have been clear. Even if mistrust towards the Soviets remained the US still could have had some type of relationship with Maos China.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.