Evacuation, Second World War Coursework Essay

Source B shows the blackball sides and is more personal that the first blood. Extracted from an interview with a instructor in 1988, the teacher remembers being evacuated with the school children. The interview was made in 1988 many years aft(prenominal) the war so the noblewoman would be of old age. Her memories whitethorn be woolly and non of great accuracy, and as it will create been written up by the interviewer it is petty(a) nurture. She may be influenced on her views of evacuation after the war and so be biased against it, correct though it saved so many lives at the time.She describes the children as being also afraid to talk, which I relish may pitch been true. Children were being taken away from their families and boarding a train where neither themselves or the teachers knew where they were going, as the teacher quotes we hadnt the slightest brain where we were going and we put the children on the train and the gates c put downd hind end us. The worry and anx iety affected the put forwards above all, and from this source it suggests that the mothers touch against the iron gates calling good-bye darling.Even though they were told non to come they trailed behind desperate to spend the last moments with their children. Mothers were persuaded into allow their children go by the g e rattlingwherenment and the propaganda around at the time and were regular considered selfish if they did not allow their children We do not know who the source is written by, just that it is from an interview. There does not seem to be a real purpose to this interview, but just to perhaps contribute the knowledge gathered to a history book or other hardly informative purposes, as the interview took place so long after the war was over.There would be no need therefore for the lady to lie or twist the truth purposefully. And no purpose of the interviewer to diversify her information into propaganda or such, so I thin the interview is slightly trustworthy to that extent Source C was written in 1973 and was produce a long time after the end of the war. This makes it a secondary source, as it has not come directly from the mouths of the children or the foster parent. written by a lady presumably for the purpose of educating children on evacuation, dustup and content is dulled slightly to be more appropriate for children.If it had been a book for adults it would score been described differently. The children would not have giggled but would have been offended by the automatic presumption of poverty. They may have even explained that their slippers would not fit in the case. Written for children, no bad points would have been inserted and simple language will have been used. The source may lose reliability due to being edited for children as children are not to be exposed to the negative side of evacuation.This is not a source, which shows the misery or success or evacuation, but if it was to highlight one over the other I would say i t shows the successes mostly. I know from other information that one of the main products of evacuation was the sudden realisation from the middle syndicate of the poverty and poor education of children and adults living in the slums. Shown here in the source the woman does presume they are too poor to have slippers, and is embarrassed that she presumed they would own some.Even though the children giggle about it, it is very serious that some children evacuated were too poor to have slippers and some too poor to form the necessary kit of items required. The kindness of the foster parent towards the children and the understanding of her taking them both acknowledging they were siblings show other successes of evacuation. However this was not always the case. Another foster parent may have been negative towards the child or children, and some foster -parents only had room for one.